View Single Post
  #68  
Old January 11th, 2010, 08:51 AM
landyaBhai's Avatar
landyaBhai landyaBhai is offline
Proud LLKC member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Here-Now
Posts: 6,417
landyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond reputelandyaBhai has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Gandhian Penis

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashdoc View Post
yeah ,it takes courage.godse was going to be hated by the whole nation for what he did, and he was not going to be feted and revered as a hero like bhagat singh or chandrashekhar azad.

yet he killed gandhi knowing fully well what its consequences would be for not only him,but also his family.
So basically it was a straightforward deal ... a bargain ... kill Gandhi and be ready for being maligned in history ... That is what terrorists are doing to the world today ... whoever who disagrees with their ideology they are willing to kill them and be ready to suffer the consequences ...

AshDoc pai please dont conclude on behalf of what other personalities really thought or believed in ... you are saying that for Chandrashekar and Bhagat Singh, popularity was the encouragement to lay down their life?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ashdoc View Post
do you even know why krishna married his many wives.

you dont even know their number......it is 16,108 ,not 24000.

he married them because a rakshasa had kidnapped and raped them .
once the rakshasa was killed by krishna , these unfortunate ' fallen women ' had nobody to save them ,as they had been 'used ' by the rakshasa.

these women themselves implored krishna to marry them as no-one else was ready to marry them ,and would have been abandoned.

it was an act of social service , and krishna was not using them as sex-toys for any ' experiments with half-baked untruths' like the so called mahatma .
Good logic AshDoc pai ... So you are saying that a woman who got raped should be married off to someone (even if that someone is willing to marry her but not be able to be a regular husband) and this is just because the society is cruel and illogical ... technically the practice of Sati has also been justified by the Brhmans in their scriptures ... but only when one is being satieed does one realize that it is all BS ... Also, there were other ways Krishna could have taken care of these ladies in distress ... he could have considered them to be his mother or sister or just friends and may be get them married to whoever they really wanted to ... may be Krishna would have been better off leading a crusade against the same society where these ladies would have been ostracized after rape ... may be he could have stopped the rapes (just as he did for Draupadi) ... Also, you have said it yourself here that it is OK to accept a set of women as your wives if they have no objection ... So then what is wrong with Gandhi sleeping nude with two girls ... Also, if a girl has agreed to be a wife or a friend, would you still rationalize that it is not wrong ... Only a person who cares about the society (which is basically the politics of numbers) will rationalize ... if they cant they will exalt or condemn the person depending upon how the numbers add up to ...
__________________
The Quieter You Become, The More You Can Hear
Reply With Quote