View Single Post
  #69  
Old January 11th, 2010, 09:33 AM
ashdoc ashdoc is offline
senior echarchan
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,987
ashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond reputeashdoc has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The Gandhian Penis

Quote:
Originally Posted by landyaBhai View Post
So basically it was a straightforward deal ... a bargain ... kill Gandhi and be ready for being maligned in history ... That is what terrorists are doing to the world today ... whoever who disagrees with their ideology they are willing to kill them and be ready to suffer the consequences ...
godse was hardly a terrorist .he had seen was happening to his community at the hands of muslims ,and gandhi's weak-kneed reaction to it.

in bengal hindu women were kidnapped and paraded naked before being raped by their muslim captors ,and his friend karkare had personally seen this in noakhali in what is now bangladesh and showed him photoes of the atrocities.

and what was gandhi's reaction to this ........doses of more ahimsa.....!!.......and going on a fast to prevent hindus from retaliating !!

yet godse did not take the desicion to kill gandhi until gandhi undertook a fast to give pak 55 crores of rupees ,which would be used promptly by pak to buy weapons to killl indian soldiers in kashmir


AshDoc pai please dont conclude on behalf of what other personalities really thought or believed in ... you are saying that for Chandrashekar and Bhagat Singh, popularity was the encouragement to lay down their life?

i am saying nothing like that.........

what i am saying is that ,for godse the situation was much worse and even his family was going to suffer ostracism........in fact ,the whole maharashtrian brahmin community to which he belonged suffered for this ,as they were attacked and killed by the other castes.





Good logic AshDoc pai ... So you are saying that a woman who got raped should be married off to someone (even if that someone is willing to marry her but not be able to be a regular husband) and this is just because the society is cruel and illogical ... technically the practice of Sati has also been justified by the Brhmans in their scriptures ... but only when one is being satieed does one realize that it is all BS ... Also, there were other ways Krishna could have taken care of these ladies in distress ... he could have considered them to be his mother or sister or just friends and may be get them married to whoever they really wanted to ... may be Krishna would have been better off leading a crusade against the same society where these ladies would have been ostracized after rape ... may be he could have stopped the rapes (just as he did for Draupadi) ... Also, you have said it yourself here that it is OK to accept a set of women as your wives if they have no objection ... So then what is wrong with Gandhi sleeping nude with two girls ... Also, if a girl has agreed to be a wife or a friend, would you still rationalize that it is not wrong ... Only a person who cares about the society (which is basically the politics of numbers) will rationalize ... if they cant they will exalt or condemn the person depending upon how the numbers add up to ...
you are forgetting that the women had no one to turn to as their families had been killled by the rakshashas and were alone in the world.

the women themselves asked krishna to marry them.

and in the society of those times krishna could not carry out a social reform movement like today as the people were hide-bound with tradition.

modern times were yet to come....

krishna was not an old man like gandhi ,doing some bullshit experiments like sleeping naked with his own grand -neice just to see if she aroused him or not.

he was an eminently practical person ,who offered practical solutions to problems and did not hesitate to kill and used violence when necessary.



.......................
__________________
-----
Reply With Quote