![]() |
Support eCharcha.Com. Click on sponsor ad to shop online! |
|
Notices |
Crowning Glory A home for our best content ... award winning created by eCharchans!! |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() No internet links yet. News on TV. India gets by 187 votes.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Nietzsche (1887) : God is dead God (1900) : Nietzsche is dead ----------------------------------------- I will not be hurried and I will not be bullied Last edited by echarcha; October 17th, 2010 at 04:25 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
non-permanent member of the UNSC......YIPPPEEEE
![]() ![]() WHATTA CRAP ![]()
__________________
Only peace remains at last! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
Yeah.. BRIC countries.. all emerging economies. And brother, it's not crap, it's good for us.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
The power wielding nations know very well how to keep the india and its people quiet with moongfalli.
give them some moongfalli goodies like a non-perm member of unsc, commonwealth games venue, nuclear deal blah blah. this keeps 3rd world country like india quiet and makes the fourth world ones like pakistan a little jealous. india gets fooled in international fora just like indian public is made (hutiya by our own system. what exactly happened to the nuclear deal? will something come out of it in our lifetime ![]() ![]()
__________________
Only peace remains at last! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
I'm sure this will also have economic ramifications. The permanent members do control a lot of defence related business. The other members too will get a share of the pie, apart from a say in the defence matters. Peanuts or whatever, it won't hurt India in any way. Do you see anything bad with it? Does it mean that we will be expected to toe the permanent members' line?
As for NPT, it can be kept hanging where we are concerned. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
no, nothing BAD about it except that its kinda insulting for supposedly the world's largest democracy, 2nd most populous country, emerging power, IT superpower etc etc not getting what it deserves.
when France conducted those nuclear tests, there was so much hulla gulla done by world, especially uncle sam, but they gave a damn. China almost always has its antennae up on the slightest bureaucratic slip by any country including uncle sam. india on the other hand approaches everyone with folded hands 'pls saar give us unsc permanent membership, we deserve it saar, we r the world's larget democracy saar'. the saars say, ' o yeah yeah, u definitely deserve it. u being the largest democracy r the natural fit for it'. and then nothing happens for years. than thru some election process, we get this non-perm membership after 19 years. all happy happy for the time being. ditto for almost every worthwhile thingy. this defensive attitude gives us nothing except insults and we continue doing it. why dont we once reject what is being offered ![]()
__________________
Only peace remains at last! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
Quote:
Germany and Japan are much bigger economic power than India and enjoy a much wider support in council, still they haven't managed a breakthrough, so where does India or Brazil stand? Anyways, There is nothing so great about it, if I am not wrong then countries like Pakistan have also been a non-permanent member.
__________________
I do plug in my stuff but not without asking.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
china did get a seat after 1950 .......earlier it was taiwan which had a seat.
__________________
----- |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
United Nations is irrelevant today. Its just a organisation run by people who have no other legitimate means to earn an honest living. UN is just a body which is ineffective and used by nations from time to time just to create a scene of something serious being done about something.
Its useless. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
India was offered permanent seat and veto powers ... Nerulala was busy jerking Tito and Nasser.
__________________
............................................ दूर से देखने पर तो यही लगता था ... 'वाह! वहाँ क्या मजा होता होगा!' बुरे फसें 'मजाल', आ कर जन्नत में ... हमने तो सोचा था, कुछ नया होता होगा! Stupid opinions ... all mine ... worth 2 cents ... you can have for free with a pinch of salt. "......I can't believe I am saying this..... if you re not humble in this world, this world will thrust humbleness upon you" - Mike Tyson!!! Distrust Doesn't Hurt - Not As Much as Trust does! - me said first quoted at www echarcha.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I do plug in my stuff but not without asking.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
Kindly throw some more light on it.
__________________
I do plug in my stuff but not without asking.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
Quote:
my only intention was to prove that communist china got it after 1950.
__________________
----- |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Non-Permanent Seat in UN Security Council for India !!
permanent seat in UN means India need both military firepower and financial muscle to take the responsibility, right now India is growing economy and our share in global trade is just 1.5%, bigger status in UN security council means bigger responsibility in global cause, India have scores of problem of his own, right now troops are committed only in Congo, bigger status means Somalia, Sudan, Botswana etc etc, for all these things we need both finanacial and military muscle. No problem from millitary’s side but financially we are not strong enough to take burden of this responsibility, our own defense budget is high and committing resources in global cause means more burden on tax payer. Nothing wrong, if our pocket allows it but we should avoid extra burden on genuine tax payers in India. India needs to increase its global power. US never listens to UN, it appears UN’s fate is similar to League of Nations.
India as its own set of problem, in new hunger index we are at 67th position, china at 9th, Pakistan at 52nd, Myanmar at 50th, Nepal at 56th and finally Bangladesh at 68th. We are placed in alamaring category. Same is true for our global poverty index, and our purchasing power parity, we are at middle income level at $1000 per capita income level we are middle income earning group. In our country top 8% household have wealth equal to 46% of rural wealth, some how it appears that dividends of development in not reaching bottom level as evident from hunger and poverty index. While there is nothing wrong in projecting ourselves as global power but we need to be serious to address our domestic issues where we are continuously falling. And what a superpower status means to an average Indian who is finding it difficult to earn two meals of bread, nothing, our immediate need is to raise our status of living at least upto the level of Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Malaysia. jeetIAF Last edited by jeetiaf; October 13th, 2010 at 05:55 AM. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
security council, unsc |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obama names Pak ;Backs India's bid for permanent security council membership | ashdoc | Taaza Khabar - Current news | 17 | November 16th, 2010 08:57 AM |
Now US support India for Permanent membership in UN Security council | max de Indiana | International Politics | 3 | June 26th, 2005 06:30 PM |
Corrupt Coffee Cup Annan to peddle UN Security Council seat to India for a bribe! | echarcha | International Politics | 12 | April 26th, 2005 02:49 PM |
Gang of Goons called UN Security Council ! | Indian | Defense | 0 | December 3rd, 2004 01:22 PM |
How the Security Council feels about Iraq | Diplomat | Taaza Khabar - Current news | 6 | February 14th, 2003 03:16 PM |